May 11, 2026

BNPL Licensing Requirements by State: A Guide to the Emerging Regulatory Landscape

New York's 2025 BNPL law marks the end of regulatory gray zones for buy-now-pay-later providers. Learn what licensing now requires in NY and California, which states are next, and how to prepare your compliance roadmap.

Last updated: 
May 12, 2026
Share this post

Key Takeaways

  1. BNPL licensing is here: New York's law in 2025 marks a watershed moment. BNPL will no longer operate in a regulatory gray zone—licensing and oversight are coming to multiple states.​
  2. Traditional BNPL products are now regulated: The NY model applies to BNPL regardless of interest charges, capturing traditional "pay in four, no interest" products that previously fell outside licensing requirements.​
  3. Platforms and bank partnerships are not exempt: NY law applies to platforms and bank partnership structures, not just direct lenders. If you operate BNPL infrastructure or facilitate third-party lending, you likely need authorization/licensure.​
  4. Fee caps and disclosures are coming: NY will establish maximum cumulative fees and per-charge limits. Disclosures will need to comply with both TILA and state-specific BNPL standards. Many BNPL pricing models will need to adjust.​
  5. Penalties are severe: Loans made without proper authorization are void and uncollectable. Violations are criminal misdemeanors. This is serious regulatory enforcement.​
  6. Other states will follow: Multiple states are monitoring NY's implementation and expected to follow with similar laws. Multi-state BNPL providers should expect nationwide licensing requirements within 2–3 years.​
  7. Preparation should start now: Engage regulatory counsel, assess your business model against NY standards, build compliance infrastructure, and plan for licensing rollout across key states.​

For years, buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) providers operated in a regulatory gray zone. Their products—typically "pay in four" plans with zero interest charged in four equal payments over six weeks—fell outside many state licensing requirements and the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA). But that era is ending.​

In May 2025, New York enacted the first state-specific BNPL licensing law, requiring BNPL providers to obtain licenses or authorization and comply with comprehensive regulatory requirements. This law is a watershed moment: it signals that BNPL will no longer be treated as an unregulated corner of consumer finance, and it's likely to inspire other states to follow suit.​

This guide walks you through BNPL licensing requirements, explains what's changing, and helps you understand your compliance obligations across key states.

What Is BNPL and Why the Regulatory Shift?

What Exactly Is BNPL?

Buy-now-pay-later is a form of point-of-sale credit that allows consumers to make a purchase and spread payment over installments—typically four equal payments over six weeks, with no interest charged.​

Typical Consumer Experience:

  1. Consumer selects a product at checkout (online or in-store)
  2. Consumer chooses "Pay in 4" option
  3. BNPL provider verifies consumer identity and conducts soft credit check
  4. Consumer is approved for credit instantly
  5. First payment is charged immediately; remaining three payments are charged over the next six weeks
  6. Product ships/consumer takes possession immediately​

Key Characteristics:

  • Short term: Typically 4–12 weeks
  • Small amounts: Usually $50–$500 per transaction
  • Zero interest (in traditional form)
  • No monthly billing: Payments at irregular intervals (weekly/biweekly)
  • Digital-first: Primarily available online or through mobile apps​

Why BNPL Exploded Outside Traditional Regulation

When BNPL first emerged (around 2018–2019), it benefited from regulatory exemptions designed for other products:

Federal TILA Exemption: TILA (Truth in Lending Act) applies to extensions of credit repayable in more than four installments OR that charge a finance charge. BNPL's four-equal-installment, zero-interest structure fell outside TILA's scope, avoiding federal disclosure requirements (APR, finance charge disclosures, etc.).​

State Licensing Exemptions: Many states' consumer lending licensing statutes similarly applied to loans charged interest or charged in more than four installments. Traditional BNPL—four installments, no interest—fell outside these definitions.​

Result: BNPL providers boomed without needing state origination licenses, with minimal federal oversight, and with no standardized consumer disclosures. The industry grew from near-zero to over $20 billion in annual transaction volume by 2024–2025, attracting major players like Affirm, Klarna, Afterpay (now Square), Sezzle, and others.​

Why Regulators Are Now Acting

Consumer Complaints: BNPL providers charged unexpected fees (late fees, convenience fees) that consumers felt were deceptive. Some BNPL companies reported rates of late fees exceeding what would be allowed as interest charges in traditional lending.​

No Affordability Checks: Unlike traditional consumer loans, many BNPL providers conducted minimal or no income verification or affordability assessment. This led to consumers taking multiple BNPL plans simultaneously without understanding their total payment obligations.​

Data Privacy Concerns: Many BNPL providers tracked and monetized consumer shopping behavior through their apps, raising privacy concerns—especially compared to more-regulated financial services.​

Regulatory Inconsistency: BNPL operated differently across states and with different providers, creating confusion for consumers about what protections applied. Some state regulators moved to treat BNPL as consumer loans subject to licensing; others did not.​

Federal Inaction: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) initially took a light-touch approach, issuing a 2024 Interpretive Rule treating digital-account-based BNPL as credit cards under TILA. However, the CFPB signaled it would rescind that rule, leaving a regulatory vacuum that states moved to fill.​

New York's BNPL Licensing Law: The Model for Nationwide Regulation

Timeline and Implementation

Enactment: May 9, 2025 (Senate Bill 3008, known as the New York Buy-Now-Pay-Later Act or "NY BNPL Act")​

Effective Date: 180 days after the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) promulgates implementing rules. DFS rulemaking is expected to conclude by late 2025 or early 2026, making the law effective in 2026.​

Scope: Applies to all BNPL providers extending credit to New York residents, including both direct lenders and platforms facilitating BNPL lending by third parties.​

Scope of NY BNPL Act

Who Must Comply:

The NY BNPL Act applies to persons who "offer" BNPL loans by either:

  1. Extending credit directly to a consumer, OR
  2. Operating a platform whose primary purpose is to enable third parties to offer BNPL loans​

This means the law applies not only to BNPL lenders that fund loans directly, but also to:

  • BNPL platforms/marketplaces
  • Bank partnership structures where platforms operate the BNPL infrastructure​

Definition of BNPL Loan:

A BNPL loan is an extension of closed-end credit to a New York resident for purchasing goods/services (excluding motor vehicles), regardless of whether or not the loan charges interest or finance charges.​

This is a critical expansion: By applying to BNPL loans regardless of interest charged, NY law captures traditional "pay in four, no interest" products that TILA doesn't regulate. The law also applies to BNPL repayable in one or more installments—not just four.​

Exemptions from Licensing:

The following are exempt from NY BNPL Act requirements:​

  • Banks and Credit Unions: National banks and federal thrifts (generally exempt from state lending laws)
  • Retailers making credit sales: If the retailer is the seller of the goods/services being financed (traditional point-of-sale financing)
  • Isolated or occasional transactions: Persons making only occasional BNPL transactions
  • Non-consumer lenders: If the borrower is not a natural person

However, there are important limitations: State-chartered banks must obtain authorization for BNPL lending (not fully exempt), and online marketplaces hosting multiple sellers may be treated as lenders if they take nominal title to goods or facilitate lease-to-own structures.​

NY BNPL Act: The Two-Tier Approval Scheme

The NY BNPL Act creates two distinct approval paths: License (for non-bank BNPL providers) and Authorization (for banks and existing lenders).​

License (for Non-Bank BNPL Providers)

Requirement: Non-bank BNPL providers must obtain a license from NY DFS.​

Application Process: Providers must apply through an application designed by the DFS (expected to be administered through NMLS based on NY's current licensing infrastructure, but specifics TBD).​

Likely Documentation Required (based on NY's other lending licenses):

  • Business plan and loan program descriptions
  • Financial statements (audited, if available)
  • Background and credit checks plus personal financial statements for owners/principals
  • Anti-money laundering, anti-fraud, and fair lending policies
  • Compliance procedures for TILA and Regulation Z
  • Data security and privacy policies
  • Consumer complaint resolution procedures​

Authorization (for Banks and Existing Lenders)

Eligibility: Banking organizations, foreign banks licensed by DFS, or existing NY-licensed lenders can apply for lighter-touch "authorization" instead of full licensure.​

Benefits: Authorization likely involves reduced application burden and lower ongoing compliance requirements compared to full BNPL license, reflecting banks' existing federal supervision.​

Product Election

Licensed or authorized BNPL lenders can offer only DFS-permitted BNPL product categories. The law contemplates multiple categories of BNPL products:​

  • Traditional BNPL (e.g., "pay in four" products)
  • Installment-based BNPL (e.g., longer-term installment plans)
  • Other DFS-permitted product types (to be defined during rulemaking)

Lenders must elect which product categories they're licensed to offer, though they can update these elections over time.​

Substantive Practice Requirements

Beyond licensing, NY BNPL Act imposes rigorous practice requirements:​

Interest and Fee Caps:

  • Charges and fees cannot exceed lawful amounts for the lender's license type
  • Charges and fees must be clearly disclosed and agreed to by consumer
  • DFS will establish maximum cumulative fees and per-charge/per-fee limits for origination, late payment, and default charges
  • Overall cap: Cannot exceed New York's 16% civil usury cap​

Disclosures:

  • Key loan terms must be disclosed clearly and conspicuously
  • Disclosures must comply with federal TILA/Regulation Z
  • State-specific disclosures as required by DFS rulemaking (still TBD)​

Additional Requirements:

  • Refund requirements for cancelled plans
  • Consumer dispute resolution processes
  • Maintenance of written policies and procedures
  • Data sharing restrictions
  • Prohibitions on deception, fraud, and unfair practices
  • Accurate consumer reporting agency furnishing
  • Prohibitions on misapplying payments​

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Loan Voidability:
BNPL loans made without required license or authorization are void and uncollectable as to all interest and charges.​

Criminal Penalties:
Operating without a license/authorization is a misdemeanor punishable by:

  • Fine up to $500 AND/OR
  • Imprisonment up to six months​

Additional Civil Penalties:
DFS has authority to assess penalties under broader lending law provisions, potentially resulting in significant fines and enforcement actions.​

Timeline to Implementation

Expected Rulemaking Schedule:

  • 2025: DFS drafts and solicits comment on proposed rules
  • Late 2025–Early 2026: DFS adopts final rules
  • 180 days after rule adoption: Law becomes effective (likely Q3–Q4 2026)

Comparison to Other NY Lending Laws:
NY's commercial finance disclosure law took nearly three years from enactment to effective date. However, BNPL rulemaking may be faster if DFS largely relies on TILA's disclosure framework rather than creating new standards from scratch.​

BNPL Licensing in Other States: California and Emerging Trends

California: BNPL as Consumer Loans

Current Treatment:

California treats most BNPL as consumer loans subject to California Finance Law licensing requirements. BNPL providers that are not banks or finance companies must obtain consumer lending licenses in California.​

California's Approach:

  • BNPL falls under California's broad consumer financing law
  • Providers must comply with California's rate caps, disclosure requirements, and consumer protection rules
  • State regulators (Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, or DFPI) monitor BNPL compliance through licensing oversight​


California's DFPI has published consumer-facing guidance warning about BNPL risks (late fees, data privacy, overspending) and directing consumers to verify BNPL provider licensing on DFPI's website.​

Nationwide Trend: Momentum Toward Licensing

States Considering Legislation:

Multiple other states are considering or expected to consider BNPL-specific legislation, inspired by New York's example.

States with active regulatory interest include:

  • Massachusetts
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Virginia​

Multistate Coalition:

A multistate coalition of attorneys general from Connecticut, North Carolina, California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, sent letters to six major BNPL providers in late December 2025. These letters outlined concerns that the companies' products may be violating state consumer protection laws. Future coordination may continue depending on market and consumer complaint trends.

Expected Regulatory Approach:
Most states following New York are expected to:

  • Require licensing for non-bank BNPL providers
  • Define BNPL based on product type (point-of-sale installment credit) rather than interest-charged or installment-count thresholds
  • Impose fee caps and disclosure requirements
  • Establish clearer rules than the current state-by-state patchwork​

Federal Developments:

  • CFPB Regulatory Uncertainty: The CFPB's 2024 Interpretive Rule (treating digital-account BNPL as credit cards under TILA) may be rescinded, leaving BNPL outside federal TILA scope unless CFPB takes new action
  • Potential Federal BNPL Rule: Some observers expect the CFPB or Congress to eventually establish federal BNPL standards, similar to TILA for traditional consumer credit​

BNPL Compliance Roadmap for Multi-State Providers

Step 1: Regulatory Mapping by State

Immediate Priority (2025–2026):

  1. New York: Await DFS rulemaking; prepare license application for launch by late 2026/early 2027
  2. California: Confirm BNPL structure qualifies as consumer loan; ensure compliance with California Finance Law
  3. Massachusetts, Illinois, Maryland: Monitor for proposed legislation; engage early if bills introduced

Ongoing Monitoring (2026+):

  • Subscribe to state regulatory alerts
  • Monitor for new state BNPL legislation
  • Track federal CFPB actions and potential rulemaking

Step 2: Product and Business Model Review

Evaluate Your BNPL Offering:

  1. Product Structure: Is your BNPL product traditional (4 installments, no interest), or have you innovated with:
    • Longer repayment terms?
    • Interest charges?
    • Variable payment schedules?
    • Late fees or other charges?
  2. Lending Model: Are you:
    • A direct BNPL lender (you fund loans)?
    • Operating a platform (third parties fund through your platform)?
    • A bank partner (bank funds, you handle underwriting/servicing)?
  3. Consumer Communication: How do you market your product? Who do consumers believe is their lender—you or a partner bank?​

Why This Matters: Regulatory exposure depends on your product structure and lending model. NY law applies to platforms regardless of whether they directly fund loans, meaning bank-partnership models likely require BNPL authorization or trigger true lender doctrine analysis.​

Step 3: Infrastructure and Systems Assessment

Compliance Systems to Build/Upgrade:

  1. Disclosure Generation: Ensure you can generate disclosures meeting both TILA and state-specific BNPL standards (once finalized)
  2. Fee Caps: Build loan system controls preventing charges/fees from exceeding state limits (varies by state)
  3. Consumer Data Reporting: Establish systems for furnishing consumer information to credit reporting agencies accurately
  4. Complaint Handling: Document procedures for receiving, investigating, and resolving consumer complaints
  5. Audit and Testing: Implement monthly/quarterly compliance audits sampling disclosures, fees, and consumer treatment​

Step 4: Application Preparation (NY Focus)

Once NY DFS Finalizes Rules (Expected Late 2025–Early 2026):

  1. Determine Approval Path: Will you apply for BNPL license (if non-bank) or authorization (if bank/existing lender)?
  2. Gather Documentation:
    • Business plan and BNPL program description
    • Financial statements
    • Background checks and personal financial statements for owners/principals
    • Policies: anti-fraud, fair lending, data security, consumer complaint resolution
    • TILA/Regulation Z compliance procedures
    • Marketing materials and sample loan documents
  3. Engage Regulatory Counsel: Hire NY-licensed regulatory counsel to guide application process and compliance strategy
  4. Submit Application: Likely through NMLS platform (anticipated but not confirmed)
  5. License Approval: Expect 60–90 day review period post-submission​

Step 5: Ongoing Compliance Post-Licensure

Once licensed/authorized in NY (or any state with BNPL licensing):

Annual Requirements:

  • License renewal
  • Annual financial reporting
  • Activity reporting (loan volume, consumer complaints, fee statistics)

Ongoing Obligations:

  • Maintain compliance systems and controls
  • Monitor regulatory updates and guidance from DFS
  • Conduct internal compliance testing
  • Consumer complaint investigation and resolution
  • Fair lending and anti-fraud monitoring​

Regulatory Examinations:

  • Risk-based exams every 2–5 years
  • Prepare loan files, disclosures, policies, and complaint logs
  • Demonstrate compliance with all NY BNPL Act requirements

FAQs

Does my BNPL product structure affect my licensing obligations?

Yes, significantly. Both product structure and lending model affect regulatory exposure:

Product structure: Traditional "pay in four, no interest" products are now within scope of NY's BNPL Act

regardless of interest charged. Products with longer repayment terms, interest charges, or variable

payment schedules may trigger licensing under existing state statutes in other states.

Lending model: Direct BNPL lenders require full licensing in NY and CA. Platform operators are

captured by NY law's platform prong. Bank partner models likely require NY authorization and are subject

to true lender analysis.

Consumer communications: If consumers reasonably believe you -- not a bank partner -- are their

lender, this supports a true lender finding and licensing obligation. Review all marketing, checkout flows,

and loan documents through this lens.

What are the most important compliance steps a BNPL provider should take now?

BNPL providers should begin compliance preparation immediately across five areas:

1. Regulatory mapping: Identify which states currently require licensing (notably California) and monitor

states advancing BNPL legislation, including NY, MA, IL, MD, and VA.

2. Business model review: Assess whether your product structure, lending model (direct lender,

platform, bank partnership), and consumer communications affect licensing exposure in each state.

3. Infrastructure and systems: Build or upgrade disclosure workflows to support TILA and anticipated

state-specific BNPL standards; implement loan system controls for fee caps; establish consumer

complaint handling and credit reporting procedures.

4. NY application preparation: Engage NY-licensed regulatory counsel and begin gathering application

documentation in advance of DFS finalizing rules, expected late 2025 or early 2026.

5. Ongoing monitoring: Subscribe to state regulatory alerts and track CFPB rulemaking developments.

The regulatory environment is evolving quickly.

Which other states are considering BNPL-specific licensing laws?

Multiple states are monitoring BNPL regulation following New York's May 2025 enactment. States with

active regulatory interest include Massachusetts, Illinois, Maryland, and Virginia.

In late December 2025, a multistate coalition of attorneys general from Connecticut, North Carolina,

California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin sent letters to six major BNPL providers raising

concerns that their products may be violating existing state consumer protection laws.

Multi-state BNPL providers should expect comprehensive licensing requirements to expand to additional

states within two to three years.

Does California require a license for BNPL providers?

Yes. California treats most BNPL products as consumer loans subject to licensing under the California

Finance Law. Non-bank BNPL providers must obtain a consumer lending license from the California

Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI).

California does not have a BNPL-specific statute equivalent to New York's -- it applies its existing broad

consumer financing law to most BNPL products. DFPI actively monitors BNPL compliance through

licensing oversight and has published consumer-facing guidance on BNPL risks, including late fee

concerns and data privacy.

Are there exemptions from the New York BNPL Act's licensing requirements?

Yes, but the exemptions are narrower than providers may expect.

Exempt: National banks and federal thrifts; retailers who are the actual seller of goods being financed

(traditional point-of-sale credit at the merchant level); persons making only isolated or occasional BNPL

transactions; non-consumer lenders where the borrower is not a natural person.

Important limitations: State-chartered banks must obtain DFS authorization -- they are not fully exempt.

Online marketplaces that take nominal title to goods or facilitate lease-to-own structures may be treated

as lenders. The retailer exemption applies only where the retailer is the seller, not third-party BNPL

platforms at checkout.

What are the penalties for operating a BNPL business in New York without a license?

Penalties for non-compliance with the NY BNPL Act are severe and multi-layered:

Loan voidability: BNPL loans extended without the required license or authorization are void and

uncollectable as to all interest and charges. The lender cannot enforce repayment obligations beyond

principal.

Criminal penalties: Operating without a license is a criminal misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to

$500 and/or imprisonment for up to six months per violation.

Civil penalties: DFS retains authority to assess civil penalties under broader lending law provisions,

potentially resulting in significant additional fines and enforcement actions.

■ Compliance note: Loan voidability means not only regulatory punishment, but loss of the contractual

right to collect on outstanding loans. Providers must obtain licensure before any New York lending

activity begins.

What disclosure requirements apply to BNPL providers under the NY BNPL Act?

The NY BNPL Act requires that key loan terms be disclosed clearly and conspicuously, and that

disclosures comply with federal TILA and Regulation Z requirements. DFS will also establish

state-specific BNPL disclosure standards through rulemaking.

This is a significant operational shift: because traditional "pay in four" products previously fell outside

TILA, most providers have not built TILA-compliant disclosure workflows. Those workflows -- covering

APR disclosure, finance charge disclosure, and consumer rights notices -- will need to be developed

before the law becomes effective.

What fee caps does the New York BNPL Act impose?

The NY BNPL Act establishes that charges and fees cannot exceed New York's 16% civil usury cap,

and all charges must be clearly disclosed and agreed to by the consumer.

DFS will establish through rulemaking the maximum cumulative fees and per-charge limits for: origination

fees, late payment fees, and default charges. These specifics remain to be determined. BNPL providers

whose pricing models rely heavily on late or convenience fees should evaluate fee structures against the

anticipated NY caps now.

What is the difference between a BNPL license and a BNPL authorization under New York law?

The NY BNPL Act creates two distinct approval paths:

License -- Required for non-bank BNPL providers. Involves a full application to DFS, ongoing compliance

requirements, and regulatory examination. This is the path for most fintech BNPL companies.

Authorization -- Available to banking organizations, foreign banks licensed by DFS, and existing

NY-licensed lenders. Designed to be lighter-touch, reflecting existing federal supervision. Involves a

reduced application burden and lower ongoing compliance requirements.

DFS will define the specific differences between the two paths through its rulemaking process.

Does the NY BNPL Act apply to platforms and bank partnership models -- not just direct lenders?

Yes. This is one of the most consequential aspects of the law for industry structure. The NY BNPL Act

applies to any person who either:

(1) Directly extends BNPL credit to consumers, OR

(2) Operates a platform whose primary purpose is to enable third parties to offer BNPL loans.

This means BNPL platforms and marketplace structures -- including bank partnership arrangements

where a bank funds the loan but a platform handles underwriting, servicing, and consumer-facing

operations -- are likely within scope and require licensing or authorization.

Providers that previously relied on a bank-partner structure to avoid state licensing should conduct a true

lender doctrine analysis under the NY BNPL Act framework.

■ Compliance note: If your BNPL product is structured as a bank partnership and you manage the

consumer-facing platform, assume NY licensing or authorization is required until regulatory counsel

confirms otherwise.

Which BNPL products does the New York BNPL Act cover?

The NY BNPL Act defines a BNPL loan broadly as any closed-end credit extension to a New York

resident for the purchase of goods or services (excluding motor vehicles), regardless of whether the loan

charges interest or finance charges.

This is a critical departure from prior law: traditional "pay in four, zero interest" products -- which

previously fell outside TILA and most state licensing statutes -- are fully within scope. The law covers

BNPL products repayable in one or more installments, not only the four-installment structure.

What is the New York BNPL Act and when does it take effect?

The New York Buy-Now-Pay-Later Act (Senate Bill 3008) was enacted on May 9, 2025 -- making it the

first state-specific BNPL licensing law in the United States. It requires BNPL providers to obtain a license

or authorization from the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) before extending BNPL

credit to New York residents.

Effective date: The law becomes operative 180 days after DFS finalizes implementing rules. DFS

rulemaking is expected to conclude in late 2025 or early 2026, making the law effective in 2026, with full

compliance likely required by Q3-Q4 2026.

■ Compliance note: The NY DFS rulemaking timeline is not guaranteed. Providers should monitor DFS

announcements and not wait for final rules to begin building compliance infrastructure and gathering

application documentation.

What is the current federal regulatory status of BNPL?

The federal regulatory status of BNPL is currently unsettled. The CFPB issued a 2024 Interpretive Rule

that would have treated digital-account-based BNPL as credit cards under TILA. However, the CFPB has

signaled it may rescind that rule, returning traditional BNPL outside federal TILA coverage.

This federal vacuum is a primary driver of state-level BNPL legislation. Providers should not rely on

federal preemption as a compliance strategy and should plan for a state-by-state licensing approach.

Why did "pay in four" BNPL fall outside licensing requirements historically -- and why is that changing?

Traditional BNPL was structured to thread the needle of two key regulatory triggers:

Federal TILA: Applies to credit repayable in more than four installments OR that charges a finance

charge. Four-installment, zero-interest BNPL satisfied neither threshold.

State lending statutes: Most state consumer lending laws similarly applied only to loans charging

interest or repayable in more than four installments. Traditional BNPL fell outside those definitions too.

Regulators are now acting because this gap enabled consumer harm: unexpected fees, no affordability

checks or income verification, data privacy concerns, and an inconsistent patchwork of consumer

protections. New York's BNPL Act addressed this by defining BNPL loans based on product type --

point-of-sale installment credit -- rather than interest charged or installment count.

Do BNPL providers need a state license to operate in the United States?

It depends on the state and the structure of your BNPL product. Historically, traditional "pay in four" BNPL

products -- four equal installments, zero interest -- fell outside most state licensing requirements and the

federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), creating a regulatory gray zone. That is changing rapidly.

New York enacted the first state-specific BNPL licensing law in May 2025, requiring non-bank BNPL

providers to obtain a DFS license before extending credit to New York residents.

California currently treats most BNPL as consumer loans subject to licensing under the California

Finance Law. Multi-state BNPL providers should expect licensing requirements to expand to additional

states within two to three years.

Schedule a Demo

Schedule a demo to see how Brico can streamline your licensing process.