Dec 22, 2025

Who Needs a Money Transmitter License? 8 Common Company Types

Deciding whether your business needs money transmitter licenses is one of the most important—and complex—calls you will make as a fintech founder. Misjudge this, and you risk enforcement actions, frozen bank accounts, and delayed product launches.

Last updated: 
December 22, 2025
Share this post
Map of the United States showing interconnected payment flows across state lines, illustrating the multi-state nature of money transmitter licensing requirements

This guide focuses specifically on who needs licenses, using business models and fact patterns rather than abstract legal language.

How to Evaluate Whether You Are a Money Transmitter

Most state regulators start with a simple question: do you touch money, even briefly, in any form?​

Your company likely needs money transmitter licenses if it:

  • Accepts customer funds for the purpose of sending them to third parties.
  • Controls funds temporarily—whether for seconds, minutes, or days—before forwarding them.
  • Uses accounts or wallets you control to hold customer balances.
  • Has customers or recipients in multiple states, moves US based payor money across state lines or internationally.

The duration of control usually matters less than the fact of control. If your system can pause, pool, or reroute funds, regulators will treat that as custody.

8 Business Models That Usually Need Money Transmitter Licenses

Different statutes use different terms, but the same core business models show up in enforcement actions and licensing portfolios. These company types almost always need MTLs somewhere in the U.S.:​

1. Remittance Services

Remittance providers accept money from senders and deliver it to recipients domestically or across borders. Well‑known brands like Western Union, MoneyGram, and Wise hold licenses in nearly every state because:

  • They receive funds from customers.
  • They commit to paying those funds out to designated recipients.
  • They operate across multiple states and countries.​

This is the textbook case regulators use when explaining money transmission.

2. Cryptocurrency Exchanges, Stablecoins and Wallets

Many crypto businesses meet money transmission definitions because they:

  • Receive fiat funds to buy crypto.
  • Utilize an on ramp model.
  • Receive crypto for conversion or transfer to another wallet.
  • Allow customers to send digital assets to third parties.​

Most states now treat exchanging, transmitting, or holding cryptocurrency on behalf of others as money transmission, especially if you also touch fiat rails.

3. Mobile and P2P Payment Apps

Peer‑to‑peer payment apps like Venmo and Cash App:

  • Hold and control funds during transfers.
  • Maintain balances and internal ledger entries.
  • Move money between users inside their systems.​

Even when transfers feel instant, those moments of control combined with third‑party payouts create money transmission risk.

4. Bill Payment Services

Third‑party bill pay platforms receive customer payments and send them to utilities, lenders, or other creditors. Regulators see that as:

  • Taking possession of a consumer’s funds.
  • Forwarding those funds to a designated biller.​

That intermediary role is usually enough to trigger licensing.

5. Currency Exchange Services

Foreign exchange businesses receive value in one form (for example, USD) and return value in another (for example, EUR or another currency). Many states treat:

  • Currency exchange kiosks and online FX platforms.
  • Crypto‑to‑fiat and fiat‑to‑crypto conversion services.
    as money transmitters or broader money services businesses.​

6. Check Cashers

Check cashing businesses take checks from customers and pay out cash. Regulators view this as:

  • Receiving monetary value.
  • Making that value available in another form.​

Licensing frameworks vary, but many check cashers end up under money transmission or money services business regimes.

7. Prepaid Card Issuers and Reload Networks

Prepaid card issuers and reload networks:

  • Receive funds to load or reload stored value.
  • Hold balances until cardholders spend them.
  • Move value when customers transfer or redeem those balances.​

Because they control customer funds on stored value instruments, these entities often require money transmitter licenses.

8. Marketplace and Platform Facilitators

Marketplaces and gig platforms can become money transmitters when they:

  • Receive a buyer’s funds.
  • Hold those funds in platform accounts.
  • Release payment to the seller or service provider after some condition is met.​

The key risk areas include:

  • Holding funds for days or weeks.
  • Commingling buyer and seller funds.
  • Exercising discretion over when and how payouts occur.

Small design choices—such as when you debit, when you settle, and whose name appears on transaction receipts—can change your licensing profile.

Who Needs a Money Transmitter License?
Company Type Examples Why They Need MTLs
Remittance ServicesWestern Union, MoneyGram, WiseSend customer money across borders/states
Cryptocurrency Exchanges/WalletsCrypto wallet appsTransfer digital assets = value transmission
Mobile Payment AppsVenmo, Cash App, ZelleP2P transfers hold/control funds briefly
Bill Payment ServicesBill.comReceive payments to forward to utilities/lenders
Currency Exchange (FX)Currency exchange kiosks, OFXExchange fiat/crypto = money transmission
Check CashersCheck cashing stores/chainsCash checks = receive and pay out funds
Prepaid Card Issuers/ReloadersNetspend, Green Dot (reload networks)Load/reload cards = transmit stored value
Marketplace FacilitatorsAirbnb (if holding funds), some gig platformsHold buyer funds before payout to sellers

Who Usually Does Not Need a Money Transmitter License

Some entities operate in or around payments without needing their own MTLs, but the details matter.​

Common examples:

  • Agents of licensed transmitters
    In some structures, agents operate under a principal’s license rather than obtaining their own, but these arrangements require careful contracts and disclosures. Some payroll companies can fall under this definition in some states, but not in other states.
  • Banks and credit unions
    Already heavily regulated; most states exempt them from separate MTL requirements, although affiliates may not share that exemption automatically.
  • Certain payment processors
    Processors that never take possession or control of funds and move money directly from customer to merchant may qualify for narrow exemptions.
  • Government entities
    Government agencies generally are exempt when acting in a governmental capacity.

Every exemption is state-specific. A model that qualifies as a pure processor in one jurisdiction may be a licensed money transmitter in another.

Key Questions to Diagnose Your Licensing Footprint

Before assuming you are exempt, walk through these questions:​

  • Do you receive money or monetary value from customers?
  • Are those funds intended for someone else?
  • Do you hold or control the funds at any point before they reach the recipient?
  • Do you or your customers span more than one state?
  • Do you support non‑traditional instruments such as stored value, crypto, or cross‑border transfers?

If you answer “yes” to several of these questions, you likely need money transmitter licenses. The number of licenses will depend on your customer locations, transaction flows, and risk profile, but many companies end up licensed in 40 or more jurisdictions.​

Why Getting This Wrong Is Expensive

Running an unlicensed company is illegal.

Operating without required licenses violates both federal and state law. At the federal level, 18 U.S.C. § 1960 makes operating an unlicensed money transmitting business a criminal offense punishable by up to five years in prison. States have their own penalties, which can include substantial fines, cease-and-desist orders, and criminal charges.

Under‑licensing carries additional operational and strategic risks:

  • Regulator penalties and fines 
  • Cease‑and‑desist orders that disrupts business in specific states.
  • Reputational damage with regulators, hampering any future regulated activity
  • Loss of trust with  banks, investors,customers and partners as the regulator actions against a company is usually a public thing
  • Future Investor/ Acquirer diligence findings that delay or kill fundraising rounds.​

Many founders underestimate how much time licensing will occupy if addressed reactively instead of strategically.

Related: How Much do MTLs Cost?

How FinCEN MSB Registration Fits In

FinCEN MSB registration and state money transmitter licensing work together but serve different purposes in your compliance stack.

FinCEN money services business registration is a federal registration, not a license. When you register as an MSB, you are effectively added to the federal roster of non‑bank money movers in the U.S. so regulators can monitor anti‑money laundering controls and suspicious activity reporting. This registration brings you into the Bank Secrecy Act framework but does not itself authorize you to conduct money transmission.

There is no such thing as a “Federal MTL.” FinCEN MSB registration is not a “federal money transmitter license,” and it does not replace or preempt state licensing. The authority to grant permission to conduct money transmission sits with individual state regulators. Even if you are properly registered as an MSB, operating without required state licenses can still constitute unlicensed money transmission under both state and federal law.

Practical Next Steps if You Likely Need Licenses

If your answers and business model suggest you are a money transmitter, you can move forward in a structured way:​

  1. Get legal opinion on your business model
    Work with experienced counsel or licensing specialists to validate that your model meets or is exempted  in target states.
  2. Assess readiness
    Evaluate corporate structure, networth requirements, compliance leadership, financials, and technology controls MTLs are a heavy lift and you need to be ready.
  3. Plan your documentation
    Begin drafting your business plan, policies, and financial projections tailored to money transmission, not just investors.

For definitional background, see What Is a Money Transmitter License (MTL)?, and for costs, timelines, and state strategy, refer to the broader money transmitter license guide for fintech startups.

How Brico Makes MTL Licensing Faster and Easier

Brico built its platform specifically to solve these problems. Instead of treating licensing as a necessary evil that drains resources, Brico transforms it into a streamlined, manageable process.

Automation that eliminates busywork. Brico's platform auto-populates applications across all 50+ state and territory jurisdictions, so you're not manually entering the same company information dozens of times. When you update something once—a new address, an additional key personnel member—it flows through to every relevant application.

Expert guidance built into the workflow. The platform encodes years of licensing expertise into its processes. This isn't generic advice: it's state-specific guidance that reflects how each regulator actually operates.

Real-time tracking and deadline management. Brico's dashboard shows you exactly where every application stands, what's needed next, and what deadlines are approaching. No more spreadsheets tracking 48 different state timelines. No more missed renewal dates that put your licenses at risk.

Ongoing compliance, not just initial licensing. Getting licensed is only the beginning. Brico handles the full lifecycle: renewals, annual reports, and license amendments. Your compliance obligations stay organized and on track without requiring a dedicated internal team.

Faster time to market. Companies using Brico consistently apply for licenses faster than those using traditional methods. When your competitors are still filling out applications, you're already serving customers.

The ROI is straightforward: Brico costs less than hiring a full compliance team or relying on outside counsel, gets you licensed faster, and reduces the risk of application delays or compliance failures that could derail your business.

Ready to discuss your MTL roadmap? Contact Brico to explore how we can help you navigate the licensing process efficiently.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or regulatory advice. Brico is not a law firm and does not provide legal counsel. Licensing requirements vary by state and depend on your specific business model and circumstances. You should consult with qualified legal counsel before making any licensing decisions or taking action based on this content.

FAQs

How does FinCEN MSB registration relate to state money transmitter licenses?

FinCEN MSB registration is a federal registration under the Bank Secrecy Act that brings you into the anti-money laundering framework but does not authorize you to conduct money transmission. The blog emphasizes that there is no “Federal MTL” and that FinCEN MSB registration does not replace or preempt state money transmitter licensing requirements.

If my company only operates in one state, do I still need an MTL?

State money transmitter licensing is granted by individual state regulators, not federally. If your activities meet that single state’s definition of money transmission, you may still need a license there even if you do not yet operate in other states.

Does using cryptocurrency change who needs a money transmitter license?

The blog explains that many cryptocurrency exchanges, stablecoin businesses, and wallets meet money transmission definitions when they receive fiat funds, receive crypto for conversion or transfer, or allow customers to send digital assets to third parties. It also notes that most states now treat exchanging, transmitting, or holding cryptocurrency on behalf of others as money transmission, especially where fiat rails are involved.

Do marketplace or gig platforms need money transmitter licenses?

Marketplaces and gig platforms can become money transmitters when they receive buyer funds, hold those funds in platform accounts, and release them to sellers or service providers once conditions are met. Key risk areas the blog flags include holding funds for days or weeks, commingling buyer and seller funds, and exercising discretion over when and how payouts occur.

Can partnering with a licensed money transmitter replace getting our own licenses?

The blog describes that agents of licensed transmitters may operate under a principal’s license instead of obtaining their own, in certain structures. These arrangements require careful contracts, disclosures, and attention to state-by-state differences, and not all business models or states will treat an entity as covered under a principal’s license.

If my company is a payment processor, do we still need MTLs?

Some payment processors may not need money transmitter licenses if they truly never take possession or control of funds and simply move money directly from customer to merchant. However, the blog emphasizes that these exemptions are narrow and state-specific, so many processors still end up treated as money transmitters depending on their model.

What is the payment processor exemption?

The blog notes that certain payment processors may qualify for narrow exemptions when they never take possession or control of funds and move money directly from customer to merchant. These exemptions are limited, and whether a processor qualifies depends on specific state rules and how the actual flow of funds is structured.

How do exempt vs non-exempt models differ for money transmission?

Non-exempt models that meet state money transmission definitions generally must obtain licenses in the states where they operate. By contrast, some entities are commonly exempt from separate money transmitter licenses, such as agents of licensed transmitters in certain structures, banks and credit unions, certain payment processors that never take possession or control of funds, and government entities acting in a governmental capacity.

What business models that require MTLs should founders watch for?

Founders should pay attention to business models that receive money from customers, hold or control those funds, and then deliver them to a designated recipient. The blog highlights eight such models that usually need MTLs somewhere in the U.S.: remittance services, cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets, mobile and P2P apps, bill payment services, currency exchange services, check cashers, prepaid card issuers and reload networks, and marketplace or platform facilitators.

Who needs a money transmitter license in the U.S.?

Companies generally need money transmitter licenses when they accept money or monetary value from one person and make it available to another. Remittance services, many crypto businesses, mobile and P2P payment apps, third-party bill pay services, foreign exchange services, check cashers, prepaid card programs, and some marketplaces usually need MTLs somewhere in the U.S.

Does my fintech need a money transmitter license?

Your fintech likely needs money transmitter licenses if it accepts customer funds to send them to third parties, controls those funds even briefly, or uses accounts or wallets you control to hold customer balances. Having customers or recipients in multiple states, or moving U.S.-based payer money across state lines or internationally, increases the likelihood that licenses are required.

Will operating unlicensed affect my ability to raise funding or find bank partners?

Yes. During due diligence, sophisticated investors and banking partners will ask about your licensing status and compliance history. A history of unlicensed operation signals poor judgment and creates ongoing legal risk—making your company uninvestable and unlikely to secure essential banking relationships.

What are the penalties for unlicensed money transmission?

The consequences are serious at both the state and federal level:

  • State penalties can include substantial fines, cease-and-desist orders, and criminal charges
  • Federal penalties under 18 U.S.C. § 1960 can include up to five years in prison for operating an unlicensed money transmitting business
  • Personal liability means these penalties often apply to individual founders, not just the company

What happens if I operate unlicensed and then apply for a license?

Operating without a license actually makes getting licensed harder. License applications ask whether you've previously conducted money transmission without authorization. Answering yes raises immediate red flags with regulators and can result in application denials, significantly longer review periods, or conditions that make your license difficult to use. You may also need to unwind existing customer relationships or pause operations entirely during remediation.

Why can't I just launch my fintech product and get licensed later?

Unlike other areas of business regulation where you might receive a warning and time to comply, money transmission is different. Operating without required licenses can trigger immediate enforcement action, asset freezes, and even personal criminal liability for founders. State regulators and FinCEN don't send friendly reminders—they send subpoenas.

Schedule a Demo

Schedule a demo to see how Brico can streamline your licensing process.